On 10/02/2013 09:39 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
Many btusb devices have 2 modes, a hid mode and a bluetooth hci mode. These
devices default to hid mode for BIOS use. This means that after having been
reset they will revert to HID mode, and are no longer usable as a HCI.
Therefor it is a very bad idea to just blindly make reset_resume point to
the regular resume handler. Note that the btusb driver has no clue how to
switch these devices from hid to hci mode, this is done in userspace through
udev rules, so the proper way to deal with this is to not have a reset-resume
handler and instead let the usb-system re-enumerate the device, and re-run
the udev rules.
I must also note, that the commit message for the commit causing this
problem has a very weak motivation for the change:
"Add missing reset_resume dev_pm_ops. Missing reset_resume results in the
following message after power management device test. This change sets
reset_resume to btusb_resume().
[ 2506.936134] btusb 1-1.5:1.0: no reset_resume for driver btusb?
[ 2506.936137] btusb 1-1.5:1.1: no reset_resume for driver btusb?"
Making a change solely to silence a warning while also changing important
behavior (normal resume handling versus re-enumeration) requires a commit
message with a proper explanation why it is safe to do so, which clearly lacks
here, and unsurprisingly it turns out to not be safe to make this change.
Reverting the commit in question fixes bt no longer working on my Dell
E6430 after a suspend/resume, and I believe it likely also fixes the
following bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988481
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010649
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1213239
This reverts commit 502f769662978a2fe99d0caed5e53e3006107381.
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Patch has been applied to bluetooth.git. Thanks.
why? Because we have one broken Dell Bluetooth dongle. Do we actually know how this affects other chips. The dell HID Proxy thing has always been special case and that is Dell's fault. Look at the extra code that we have in hid2hci tool and its udev rules for Dell hardware. Is anybody actually willing to investigate this one properly.
Regards
Marcel
Sorry for the late reply on this. Sorry for the regression on Dell. I
didn't see any problems when I tested it on the bluetooth mouse I have.
However, I understand what Hans is saying. My change did cause a
regression. I will investigate this further.
The warning message itself is very misleading in the sense that it gives
the impression that the resume routine that should have been installed
is missing. Which is what caused me to fix things in the first place.
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@xxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
