Hi Marcel, On Sun, Sep 15, 2013, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > I have nothing against ENOENT. I however am a bit concerned about that > we accidentally use ENOENT in some other case and end up overloading > its meaning. > > So just for the sake of making this unique, I would consider going > with EBADSLT. I am not married to this at all. However I wanted to > have this talked through so that we understand the whole picture. If I > would know the perfect answer, I would have just forced you to use it > ;) I really don't have a strong opinion one way or another, both seem good enough to me, but since ENOENT has you feeling a bit uneasy I'll change this to EBADSLT for the next revision (which will hopefully be the last one for this error code issue). Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
