Hi,
On Wednesday 26 of June 2013 17:03:23 Syam Sidhardhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Syam Sidhardhan <syamsidhardh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Syam Sidhardhan <s.syam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > For certain devices (ex: HID mouse), support for authentication,
> > > pairing and bonding is optional. For such devices, the ACL alive
> > > for too long after the l2cap disconnection.
> > >
> > > To avoid keep ACL alive for too long, set the ACL timeout back to
> > > HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT when l2cap is connected.
> > >
> > > commit id:a9ea3ed9b71cc3271dd59e76f65748adcaa76422 might have introduce
> > > this issue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sang-Ki Park <sangki79.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Syam Sidhardhan <s.syam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > I'm not sure whether we need hci_conn_hold() and hci_conn_put() across
> > > while updating the disc_timeout. In certain other places in the code
> > > it's done. Ex: hci_auth_complete_evt(), hci_link_key_notify_evt() etc.
> > > Here I took that as the reference.
> > >
> > > net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 5 ++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> > > index 82a3bdc..7a544c2 100644
> > > --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
> > > @@ -1360,7 +1360,6 @@ static void l2cap_le_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> > > sk = chan->sk;
> > >
> > > hci_conn_hold(conn->hcon);
> > > - conn->hcon->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
> > >
> > > bacpy(&bt_sk(sk)->src, conn->src);
> > > bacpy(&bt_sk(sk)->dst, conn->dst);
> > > @@ -1380,6 +1379,10 @@ static void l2cap_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn)
> > >
> > > BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
> > >
> > > + hci_conn_hold(conn->hcon);
> > > + conn->hcon->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT;
> > > + hci_conn_put(conn->hcon);
> > > +
> > > if (!hcon->out && hcon->type == LE_LINK)
> > > l2cap_le_conn_ready(conn);
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.7.9.5
> > >
> >
> > ping.
> >
>
> Is there any comment on this patch?
> If this patch looks valid I can rebase it with the latest code and
> send it once again.
>
The funny thing is that original patch send to ML has this timer set back to
HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT in l2cap_connect_req(), not in l2cap_le_conn_ready().
See [1]. There were some big changes in l2cap code in bluetooth-next.git
while this was committed to bluetooth.git so maybe some merge conflict was
incorrectly resolved or sth...
This patch looks ok to me. Just please make sure it works correctly
in scenario described in original commit.
ps
hold/put was to restart timer with new value, I think now it is hold/drop and
timer is replaced with workqueue and is needed if you want new timeout to be
used.
[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/27532
--
BR
Szymon Janc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
