Hi, On 19:54 Tue 02 Apr, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > These patches fix build with gcc >= 4.8. I'd prefer to use plain ++/-- for > these refcounts since we are not running multiple threads, but I'm preserving > the previous behavior. > > Note in some of the commits that the use of atomic operations was wrong, and it > was not noticed only because there aren't multiple threads. > > It's an RFC because it's only compile-tested (and 'make check' was executed as > well). Please take a look in the patches and tell me if we want > to continue with atomic operations. Then I can run some tests tomorrow. Just to (publicly) clarify a doubt that I had, in case it matters to anyone else, clang also has these built-ins. Cheers, -- Vinicius -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
