Re: [PATCH] Correct the dbus service file's systemd unit name for bluez.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi William,

> >> >> Even though dbus-org.bluez.service is set as an alias for the
> >> >> bluetooth.service systemd unit file, systemd will not be able to load
> >> >> the bluetooth daemon without the daemon being enabled (and the
> >> >> dbus-org.bluez.service file linked to bluetooth.service). This patch
> >> >> allows the daemon to be loaded by other services on demand.
> >> >
> >> > as you have noticed we have this in bluetooth.service:
> >> >
> >> > [Install]
> >> > WantedBy=bluetooth.target
> >> > Alias=dbus-org.bluez.service
> >> >
> >> > Isn't this exactly what we want anyway. The service must be enabled
> >> > first before it will ever auto-started. Otherwise it just auto-starts
> >> > and the user can never get rid of it.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Oh I didn't realize that was the intent. Is that because if it is auto
> >> enabled there is no way for the service to be masked to avoid it from
> >> auto starting? I was hoping to have the daemon start once it was
> >> requested by default. Probably more of a distro choice though.
> >
> > I am actually curious on what is the best way here. My current thinking
> > is that the daemon should be started when hardware is present. Starting
> > it only because of a UI applet seems silly if there is no hardware
> > present, but I am not sure what's the appropriate default is here.
> 
> That is an interesting point. I was looking at it like I do for
> connman, where it will start even if there isn't any network
> interfaces currently available and that is expected behavior to me.
> Bluez could be waiting on a usb bluetooth adapter to be added just
> like connman is waiting on a usb ethernet adapter (and it isn't
> obvious to my that this is taking up a much in the way of resources or
> adding a lot of wakeups but I don't know). Either way I expect an easy
> to turn on and off UI component making either default simple to
> correct. Right now, the connman UI I am using just presents a
> bluetooth option for enable/disable but it doesn't work as is without
> the service being able to autostart without being enabled manually (or
> by the distro default).

in general the Bluetooth option should only be present if you have
bluetoothd running and at least one controller attached.

So my thinking is that attaching a controller will start bluetoothd and
then connmand will pick up up and present Bluetooth as technology. So
that should all work.

ConnMan actually detects at runtime the start/restart of bluetoothd.

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux