Hi Luiz, On 01/13/2013 04:29 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
I wonder if we should complicate more the testing scripts adding such futures or start working in a proper C tool such as bluetoothctl e.g. obexctl? -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
In my opinion it would be nice if the test scripts support most profile features that are implemented in bluez/obexd. That's why I extended the map-client. I tried to keep it as simple as possible while focusing also on good testing usability.
The language used for the test scripts / programs doesn't matter that much since the scripts are mainly for developers/testers. Python has some advantages, the scripts can be changed easily while working on new features.
However, until some script replacement tool is available, it still would make sense to extend/maintain the scripts that are there.
Regards, Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
