Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Why can't all this be replaced with
>>
>> static void print_bt_uuid(struct seq_file *f, u8 *uuid)
>> {
>> seq_printf(f, "%pUl\n", uuid);
>> }
>>
>> ?
>
> I don't think there's any reason assuming that there are no unaligned
> access considerations (which I pointed out in my other reply). I wasn't
> aware of printk having such a nice extension to the usual format
> specifiers (and neither was Gustavo as it seems). Thanks for making us
> aware of it!
lib/vsprintf.c:uuid_string() will only access "uuid" byte-by-byte so
alignment shouldn't be a problem.
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
