Re: [PATCH obexd 7/7] client-doc: Update documentation of PhonebookAccess interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Patrick,

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The user of a specific device would have to know that.
>
> SyncEvolution's "exclude fields" logic is based on the assumption that
> requesting everything, including the custom bits, will result in
> everything the device supports, just like not specifying any filter at
> all.

So there is a possibility that we detect what kind of extra bits the
remote stack implements based on vendor id/product id, but I would
like to avoid specific behavior per device. Besides it seems what we
want is all custom bits.

>> > Should the API spec really specify the full list? IMHO the documentation
>> > should make it clear that the list is not exhaustive - more fields might
>> > be added in future releases of the PBAP standard and obexd, without
>> > changing the obexd API.
>>
>> If we can discover what the bits mean then yes, but unfortunately this
>> is hardcoded in the PBAP spec (see page 30), so we are only defining
>> the one we know the meaning.
>
> It's okay to only document those, but it should still allow the use of
> the other things. Otherwise a user of the API would have to patch obexd
> to use the extensions.
>
>> > In SyncEvolution, I use ListFilterFields() to a) do sanity checks on
>> > user input and to b) build a list of all fields from which the user can
>> > exclude specific fields. Because the field list is not hard-coded, that
>> > will work for fields which are not defined yet.
>>
>> As you can see from the spec this is pretty static so adding a round
>> trip to discover the list sounds wrong to me,
>
> Hard-coding it in SyncEvolution seems equally wrong to me. If the list
> changes, then only obexd needs to be updated, not "obexd +
> SyncEvolution".
>
> It's only one round-trip per session. As a tradeoff between performance
> and being future-proof I think doing the call is worth it.

Fair enough so Im keeping ListFilterFields with original names to be
direct match to the vcard fields, I hope this is really useful for
someone.

-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux