Hi Johan, On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 05:06:35PM +0300, Johan Hedberg wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:26:30AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > > Hi Andrei, > > > > > > * Andrei Emeltchenko <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@xxxxxxxxx> [2012-06-15 09:10:54 +0300]: > > > > > > > From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Vendor-specific events shall be processed in driver and not sent > > > > to bluetooth stack where they screw up HCI command countings. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Tested-by: Bing Zhao <bzhao@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_drv.h | 2 +- > > > > drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_main.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- > > > > drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c | 9 ++++++--- > > > > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > > > Patch has been applied to the bluetooth tree. Thanks. > > > > Which version have you applied? Old one? > > The patch that's upstream doesn't have the Tested-by tag so it seems > Gustavo might have applied the old version of the patch instead of v2. > Could you confirm? Yes, there is old version. Apart from missing Tested-by tag there is one style issue, debug issue and variable scope change which do not affect functionality though. If that patch would applied to bluetooth-next first I would notice that much earlier... Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
