Re: [PATCH RFC] gdbus: Rename variables named "signal" (so that it can be compiled with -Wshadow)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lucas,

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >>>> Would it be interesting to add this option to acinclude.m4? Or does it
> >>>> generate too much noise?
> >>>
> >>>  It generates few warnings. Depending on the acceptance of this patch,
> >>> I could fix bluez as a whole and add -Wshadow to acinclude.m4.
> >>
> >>  Actually, I had a partial build here. Ignore the previous answer, it
> >> generates a lot of warnings.
> >>
> >
> > If we're not going to enable -Wshadow by default, does it make sense
> > to apply this patch? Who is going to check if no new shadow warnings
> > are being inserted in new commits?
> 
> I'm all for doing the following:
> 
> 1) Fix all the places with shadow variables
> 2) Add -Wshadow to the warning flags
> 
> There are lots of them.

Agreed. This could be one of the targets before releasing BlueZ 5.0.

Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux