On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Bartosz Szatkowski <bulislaw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> So the plan is to return something else than the raw XML that MAP
>>> provides? In that case I don't think it's necessary to hold on to the
>>> exact spec naming of these functions. E.g. GetMessages or GetMessageList
>>> might make more sense in the case that you return a pre-parsed
>>> list/structure of some kind.
>>>
>>> Johan
>>
>> We planned to return dict {field: value}. Generally I don't care much
>> about this name - we can go with GetMessageListing, as I seem to use
>> both forms without noticing it anyway.
>
> Are there still plans to continue this work? I would like to change
> this method to return a dictionary like we do for pbap and perhaps
> unify this in a single listing so we do folder + messages.
>
>
> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Luiz,
since January I'm not longer Comarch employee - so you probably should
ask Sławek/Radek/Łukasz whether they're planing to continue work on
it.
--
Cheers,
Bartosz Szatkowski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
