Re: [RFCv2 6/8] Bluetooth: Lock the L2CAP channel when sending

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Gustavo -

On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Gustavo Padovan wrote:

Hi Mat,

* Mat Martineau <mathewm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-04-27 16:50:53 -0700]:

The ERTM and streaming mode transmit queue must only be accessed while
the L2CAP channel lock is held.  Locking the channel before calling
l2cap_chan_send ensures that multiple threads cannot simultaneously
manipulate the queue when sending and receiving concurrently.

L2CAP channel locking had previously moved to the l2cap_chan struct
instead of the associated socket, so some of the old socket locking
can also be removed in this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathewm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h |    2 --
 net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c        |   15 ++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
index 2fb268f..90678a9 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
@@ -256,12 +256,10 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *bt_skb_send_alloc(struct sock *sk,
 {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;

-	release_sock(sk);
 	if ((skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, len + BT_SKB_RESERVE, nb, err))) {
 		skb_reserve(skb, BT_SKB_RESERVE);
 		bt_cb(skb)->incoming  = 0;
 	}
-	lock_sock(sk);

 	if (!skb && *err)
 		return NULL;
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
index 82b6368..ac8ce10 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
@@ -716,16 +716,13 @@ static int l2cap_sock_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock, struct ms
 	if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_OOB)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

-	lock_sock(sk);
-
-	if (sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECTED) {
-		release_sock(sk);
+	if (sk->sk_state != BT_CONNECTED)
 		return -ENOTCONN;
-	}

+	l2cap_chan_lock(chan);
 	err = l2cap_chan_send(chan, msg, len, sk->sk_priority);
+	l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);

I would move these l2cap_chan_{,un}lock calls to inside
l2cap_chan_send(). The less we use l2cap_chan_* functions here the
better.

In V1 of this RFC set, Andrei requested that the locking calls be outside of l2cap_chan_send(). The A2MP code uses l2cap_chan_send(), and already holds the channel lock.


-	release_sock(sk);
 	return err;
 }

@@ -936,9 +933,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *l2cap_sock_alloc_skb_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan,
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	int err;

+	l2cap_chan_unlock(chan);
+
 	skb = bt_skb_send_alloc(chan->sk, len, nb, &err);
 	if (!skb)
-		return (ERR_PTR(err));
+		skb = ERR_PTR(err);
+
+	l2cap_chan_lock(chan);

I would suggest the same here, but it might not be worth, since we would
need to create wrapper to call alloc_skb().

bt_skb_send_alloc is also used by HCI raw sockets and SCO, so the locking needs to be done here.

Regards,
--
Mat Martineau
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux