Hi Ulisses, > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:13:04PM -0300, Ulisses Furquim wrote: > >> When adding HCI devices hci_register_dev assigns the same name > >> hci1 for subsequently added AMP devices. > >> > >> ... > >> [ 6958.381886] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename > >> '/devices/virtual/bluetooth/hci1 > >> ... > >> > >> We assume id starts with the number we'll try to add the new device > >> and keep iterating until we find the proper place. The only difference > >> is we start with 0 for BR/EDR device and 1 for AMP devices (thus AMP > >> devices will never receive register as index 0). Then every hdev->id in > >> the _ordered_ list <= to the id we want we increment id and move the > >> variable head. In the end we'll have id as the first available one and > >> head is where you need to add hdev after to keep the list ordered. > >> > >> Reported-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Ulisses Furquim <ulisses@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> v3 - really add new hdev after head to keep the list ordered. > >> v2 - only increment id when we find it's already there in the list. > >> > >> --- > >> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 16 ++++++++++------ > >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c > >> index c4dc263..2b98c33 100644 > >> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c > >> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c > >> @@ -1739,24 +1739,28 @@ int hci_le_scan(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 type, u16 interval, u16 window, > >> /* Register HCI device */ > >> int hci_register_dev(struct hci_dev *hdev) > >> { > >> - struct list_head *head = &hci_dev_list, *p; > >> + struct list_head *head, *p; > >> int i, id, error; > >> > >> if (!hdev->open || !hdev->close) > >> return -EINVAL; > >> > >> + write_lock(&hci_dev_list_lock); > >> + > >> /* Do not allow HCI_AMP devices to register at index 0, > >> * so the index can be used as the AMP controller ID. > >> */ > >> id = (hdev->dev_type == HCI_BREDR) ? 0 : 1; > >> - > >> - write_lock(&hci_dev_list_lock); > >> + head = &hci_dev_list; > >> > >> /* Find first available device id */ > >> list_for_each(p, &hci_dev_list) { > >> - if (list_entry(p, struct hci_dev, list)->id != id) > >> + int nid = list_entry(p, struct hci_dev, list)->id; > >> + if (nid > id) > >> break; > >> - head = p; id++; > >> + if (nid == id) > >> + id++; > >> + head = p; > >> } > > > > This looks to be working but I still prefer bitmask approach as it results > > in simpler code like shown below: > > > > <------8<------------------------------------------ > > | list_for_each_entry(d, &hci_dev_list, list) > > | set_bit(d->id, inuse); > > | > > | id = find_first_zero_bit(inuse, PAGE_SIZE * 8); > > | > > <------8<------------------------------------------ > > > > Anyway I leave it to maintainers to decide. > > > > Tested-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > Well, it's certainly up to them. Thanks for checking anyway. :-) I > just don't think allocating a page, marking the bits and finding the > first available is better than the other solution (which was already > there too). However, we need any fix merged soon as 3.3 seems to be > affected by this bug. Just plugging two USB dongles on my machine > gives me the duplicate name error from sysfs. :-/ I am with you here. Allocating the page is a bit too much in my book. Especially since we already maintainer a sorted list in the first place. Patch has been applied to bluetooth-next tree. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html