Hi Andrei,
> > > @@ -1755,16 +1756,17 @@ int hci_register_dev(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> > >
> > > write_lock(&hci_dev_list_lock);
> > >
> > > - /* Find first available device id */
> > > - list_for_each(p, &hci_dev_list) {
> > > - if (list_entry(p, struct hci_dev, list)->id != id)
> > > - break;
> > > - head = p; id++;
> > > - }
> > I am now a little bit confused. Is it not enough to just replace head
> > with &hci_dev_list to get this fixed? Or why is this failing in the
> > first place actually.
>
> You can see actual code above. If you have hci0 and hci1 adding third AMP
> will fail since it just checks 0!=1 => break and trying to create hci1
> again.
I see a problem when you having only AMPs (no BR/EDR controller). Then
hci0 will be skipped and keep trying to create hci1 over and over again.
However in the case we have BR/EDR controller on hci0 and hci1 as AMP,
then this should just work.
So we need to fix the case where we have no BR/EDR controller on hci0
and trying to fix something else. Or did I get confused?
> > Also this change will of course break the fix that we added to ensure
> > that the HCI list comes sorted when calling hciconfig.
>
> Actually it still works. But if we want it to stay ordered after
> deleting/adding then we need a small fix.
We added a fix for it to keep them sorted. So we might should retain
that behavior from now on.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
