Re: [PATCH 2/2] bluetooth: hci_core: fix NULL-pointer dereference at unregister

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johan,

> Make sure hci_dev_open returns immediately if hci_dev_unregister has
> been called.
> 
> This fixes a race between hci_dev_open and hci_dev_unregister which can
> lead to a NULL-pointer dereference.
> 
> Bug is 100% reproducible using hciattach and a disconnected serial port:
> 
> 0. # hciattach -n /dev/ttyO1 any noflow
> 
> 1. hci_dev_open called from hci_power_on grabs req lock
> 2. hci_init_req executes but device fails to initialise (times out
>    eventually)
> 3. hci_dev_open is called from hci_sock_ioctl and sleeps on req lock
> 4. hci_uart_tty_close calls hci_dev_unregister and sleeps on req lock in
>    hci_dev_do_close
> 5. hci_dev_open (1) releases req lock
> 6. hci_dev_do_close grabs req lock and returns as device is not up
> 7. hci_dev_unregister sleeps in destroy_workqueue
> 8. hci_dev_open (3) grabs req lock, calls hci_init_req and eventually sleeps
> 9. hci_dev_unregister finishes, while hci_dev_open is still running...
> 
> [   79.627136] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> [   79.632354] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
> [   79.638122] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [   79.643920] [<c00188bc>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf8) from [<c00729c4>] (__lock_acquire+0x1590/0x1ab0)
> [   79.653594] [<c00729c4>] (__lock_acquire+0x1590/0x1ab0) from [<c00733f8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x128)
> [   79.663085] [<c00733f8>] (lock_acquire+0x9c/0x128) from [<c0040a88>] (run_timer_softirq+0x150/0x3ac)
> [   79.672668] [<c0040a88>] (run_timer_softirq+0x150/0x3ac) from [<c003a3b8>] (__do_softirq+0xd4/0x22c)
> [   79.682281] [<c003a3b8>] (__do_softirq+0xd4/0x22c) from [<c003a924>] (irq_exit+0x8c/0x94)
> [   79.690856] [<c003a924>] (irq_exit+0x8c/0x94) from [<c0013a50>] (handle_IRQ+0x34/0x84)
> [   79.699157] [<c0013a50>] (handle_IRQ+0x34/0x84) from [<c0008530>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x48/0x4c)
> [   79.708648] [<c0008530>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x48/0x4c) from [<c037499c>] (__irq_usr+0x3c/0x60)
> [   79.718048] Exception stack(0xcf281fb0 to 0xcf281ff8)
> [   79.723358] 1fa0:                                     0001e6a0 be8dab00 0001e698 00036698
> [   79.731933] 1fc0: 0002df98 0002df38 0000001f 00000000 b6f234d0 00000000 00000004 00000000
> [   79.740509] 1fe0: 0001e6f8 be8d6aa0 be8dac50 0000aab8 80000010 ffffffff
> [   79.747497] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
> [   79.756011] pgd = cf3b4000
> [   79.758850] [00000000] *pgd=8f0c7831, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
> [   79.765502] Internal error: Oops: 80000007 [#1]
> [   79.770294] Modules linked in:
> [   79.773529] CPU: 0    Tainted: G        W     (3.3.0-rc6-00002-gb5d5c87 #421)
> [   79.781066] PC is at 0x0
> [   79.783721] LR is at run_timer_softirq+0x16c/0x3ac
> [   79.788787] pc : [<00000000>]    lr : [<c0040aa4>]    psr: 60000113
> [   79.788787] sp : cf281ee0  ip : 00000000  fp : cf280000
> [   79.800903] r10: 00000004  r9 : 00000100  r8 : b6f234d0
> [   79.806427] r7 : c0519c28  r6 : cf093488  r5 : c0561a00  r4 : 00000000
> [   79.813323] r3 : 00000000  r2 : c054eee0  r1 : 00000001  r0 : 00000000
> [   79.820190] Flags: nZCv  IRQs on  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment user
> [   79.827728] Control: 10c5387d  Table: 8f3b4019  DAC: 00000015
> [   79.833801] Process gpsd (pid: 1265, stack limit = 0xcf2802e8)
> [   79.839965] Stack: (0xcf281ee0 to 0xcf282000)
> [   79.844573] 1ee0: 00000002 00000000 c0040a24 00000000 00000002 cf281f08 00200200 00000000
> [   79.853210] 1f00: 00000000 cf281f18 cf281f08 00000000 00000000 00000000 cf281f18 cf281f18
> [   79.861816] 1f20: 00000000 00000001 c056184c 00000000 00000001 b6f234d0 c0561848 00000004
> [   79.870452] 1f40: cf280000 c003a3b8 c051e79c 00000001 00000000 00000100 3fa9e7b8 0000000a
> [   79.879089] 1f60: 00000025 cf280000 00000025 00000000 00000000 b6f234d0 00000000 00000004
> [   79.887756] 1f80: 00000000 c003a924 c053ad38 c0013a50 fa200000 cf281fb0 ffffffff c0008530
> [   79.896362] 1fa0: 0001e6a0 0000aab8 80000010 c037499c 0001e6a0 be8dab00 0001e698 00036698
> [   79.904998] 1fc0: 0002df98 0002df38 0000001f 00000000 b6f234d0 00000000 00000004 00000000
> [   79.913665] 1fe0: 0001e6f8 be8d6aa0 be8dac50 0000aab8 80000010 ffffffff 00fbf700 04ffff00
> [   79.922302] [<c0040aa4>] (run_timer_softirq+0x16c/0x3ac) from [<c003a3b8>] (__do_softirq+0xd4/0x22c)
> [   79.931945] [<c003a3b8>] (__do_softirq+0xd4/0x22c) from [<c003a924>] (irq_exit+0x8c/0x94)
> [   79.940582] [<c003a924>] (irq_exit+0x8c/0x94) from [<c0013a50>] (handle_IRQ+0x34/0x84)
> [   79.948913] [<c0013a50>] (handle_IRQ+0x34/0x84) from [<c0008530>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x48/0x4c)
> [   79.958404] [<c0008530>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x48/0x4c) from [<c037499c>] (__irq_usr+0x3c/0x60)
> [   79.967773] Exception stack(0xcf281fb0 to 0xcf281ff8)
> [   79.973083] 1fa0:                                     0001e6a0 be8dab00 0001e698 00036698
> [   79.981658] 1fc0: 0002df98 0002df38 0000001f 00000000 b6f234d0 00000000 00000004 00000000
> [   79.990234] 1fe0: 0001e6f8 be8d6aa0 be8dac50 0000aab8 80000010 ffffffff
> [   79.997161] Code: bad PC value
> [   80.000396] ---[ end trace 6f6739840475f9ee ]---
> [   80.005279] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
> 
> Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |    1 +
>  net/bluetooth/hci_core.c    |    7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> index 00596e8..f626f44 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ enum {
>  	HCI_DEBUG_KEYS,
>  
>  	HCI_RESET,
> +	HCI_UNREGISTER,
>  };

what version of the kernel is this patch against? Since we cleaned up
the flags in bluetooth-next tree. Also in addition you can not just add
flags here.

>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> index 5aeb624..3937ce3 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> @@ -525,6 +525,11 @@ int hci_dev_open(__u16 dev)
>  
>  	hci_req_lock(hdev);
>  
> +	if (test_bit(HCI_UNREGISTER, &hdev->flags)) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto done;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (hdev->rfkill && rfkill_blocked(hdev->rfkill)) {
>  		ret = -ERFKILL;
>  		goto done;
> @@ -1577,6 +1582,8 @@ void hci_unregister_dev(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>  
>  	BT_DBG("%p name %s bus %d", hdev, hdev->name, hdev->bus);
>  
> +	set_bit(HCI_UNREGISTER, &hdev->flags);
> +
>  	write_lock(&hci_dev_list_lock);
>  	list_del(&hdev->list);
>  	write_unlock(&hci_dev_list_lock);

Is this really enough to protect this race condition?

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux