Re: rfcomm & encryption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Szymon,

On 04.01.2012 09:10, Szymon Janc wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> so we are establishing the connection with security level of SDP only
>> hence no encryption required. Which is the only exception to run without
>> encryption when using SSP.
>>
>> Since we do not disconnected in between SDP and RFCOMM channels, we have
>> to do a security level upgrade here. And for some reason that gets
>> triggered, but does not force encryption to be switched on.
>>
>> With SSP enabled you should always switch on encryption when getting
>> authentication complete event. Actually generally speaking you should
>> always switch on encryption after authentication. Otherwise the
>> authentication is rather pointless anyway.
>>
>> Look at commit d7556e20, then this code got re-ordered. It does not look
>> correct to me anymore. We might need to redo the whole auth and encrypt
>> callback handling.
> 
> Some time ago there was a patch from Peter Hurley that should fixed that issue.
> I've just noticed that for some reason it was not merged upstream..
> (we use it in our own branch for some time already)
> 
> [PATCH v3] Bluetooth: Fix l2cap conn failures for ssp devices
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bluetooth/msg15312.html

Thanks for the pointer. This patch fixes the problem.

cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux