Hi Johan/Lizardo,
On Nov 24, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Or do we expect it does a kind of "best effort" and runs the inquiry
>>> only?
>>
>> Yes, I think that would make most sense from user-space perspective
>> "find all devices you can". As for BR/EDR specific discovery (with no LE
>> bits) or LE specific discovery (BR/EDR bit not set) if the hardware
>> doesn't support the request then in this case I think it would in fact
>> make sense to return an error.
>
> So in summary, it should fail only if "requested_mask & supported_mask" is 0.
To keep things simpler, IMO we should have some sort of this:
DISCOV_AUTO: The kernel choose the discovery procedure based on the
hardware capabilities.
DISCOV_BREDR: The kernel runs the BR/EDR discovery procedure
DISCOV_LE: The kernel runs the LE-Only discovery procedure
BR,
Andre--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
