Hi Marcel, On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think one of the most important questions that we have to ask > ourselves at some point is if we wanna put ATT into the kernel. > > The potential candidate that forces us to think about this is HID over > Low Energy. However I like to see numbers on how the context switches > with keeping ATT in userspace will effect our latency. I still fail to see how ATT handling in kernel would reduce context switches. A GATT operation is composed of one or more (possibly many, see e.g. discovery procedures) ATT PDUs. Unless you are proposing GATT on kernel as well? Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT Manaus - Brazil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
