Hi Xi Minjun. Is there a reason for using the texasalt ? I've always used the texas command and it worked. I've been using the wl1283 and the wl1273 with the hciattach, with the following command : sudo hciattach -n /dev/ttyUSB0 texas 115200 -t 10000 the -t 10000 may not be needed, depending on the TI Init script you are using. In addition of course, you will need to put the TIInit_10.x.y.bts in /lib/firmware. Thanks, Chen Ganir > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-bluetooth-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-bluetooth- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Min Jun,Xi > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:18 AM > To: linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Regarding to TI WL1283 support in the "hciattach" command > > Hi All, > > Recently, I got one TI WL1283 devkit, which is not supported in the > current bluez code. When I am trying to attach it to my ubuntu desktop > by running the > "hciattach ttyUSB0 texasalt 115200" > command, I failed because "wl1283" can not be recognized. > In order to make it work, I read through the code in > "tools/hciattach_tialt.c", and made several code changes in > "texasalt_init()" function. And here is the diff: > > index 1ba009c..2514ee0 100644 > --- a/tools/hciattach_tialt.c > +++ b/tools/hciattach_tialt.c > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ int texasalt_init(int fd, int speed, struct termios > *ti) > { > unsigned short lmp_subv = resp[13] | (resp[14] << 8); > unsigned short brf_chip = (lmp_subv & 0x7c00) >> 10; > - static const char *c_brf_chip[8] = { > + static const char *c_brf_chip[11] = { > "unknown", > "unknown", > "brf6100", > @@ -219,7 +219,10 @@ int texasalt_init(int fd, int speed, struct > termios *ti) > "brf6300", > "brf6350", > "unknown", > - "wl1271" > + "wl1271", > + "unknown", > + "unknown", > + "wl1283" > }; > char fw[100]; > > @@ -231,7 +234,7 @@ int texasalt_init(int fd, int speed, struct termios > *ti) > "\tchip: %s (%d)\n", > lmp_subv & 0x7f, > ((lmp_subv & 0x8000) >> (15-3)) | > ((lmp_subv & 0x380) >> 7), > - ((brf_chip > 7) ? "unknown" : > c_brf_chip[brf_chip]), > + ((brf_chip > 10) ? "unknown" : > c_brf_chip[brf_chip]), > brf_chip); > > sprintf(fw, "/etc/firmware/%s.bin", > c_brf_chip[brf_chip]); > > Is there anybody from TI can update the code to support WL1283? Or can > I commit the code to bluez? Thank you! > > -- > best regards, > Xi Minjun > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- > bluetooth" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��� �^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
