Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support for custom (e)SCO parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Andrzej Kaczmarek
<andrzej.kaczmarek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why do you think re-creating the socket is not going to work? How it is
> different than second attempt to connect SCO when eSCO failed, which is now
> handled inside kernel? The same could be done by user-space but in more
> sophisticated way which suits specific requirements. And this is how
> negotiation is solved.

Well the socket API is not meant to do this type of negotiation while
connecting, you basically have connect/accept and in case you fail to
configure you have to give up this socket and create a new one, also
the error reported by the socket may not be enough to you to figure
out what went wrong the first time to retry.

> And what qualification testing will it break?
>
>
> Could you please elaborate a little bit more on the above questions so I can
> understand your point of view better.
>
> BR,
> Andrzej
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux