This patch implements a simple version of the SMP Pairing Features
exchange procedure (Vol. 3 Part H, Section 2.3.5.1).
For now, everything that would cause a Pairing Method different of
Just Works to be chosen is rejected.
Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 1 +
net/bluetooth/smp.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index 21d6055..ac2c5e8 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -1622,6 +1622,7 @@ static inline void hci_encrypt_change_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *
/* Encryption implies authentication */
conn->link_mode |= HCI_LM_AUTH;
conn->link_mode |= HCI_LM_ENCRYPT;
+ conn->sec_level = conn->pending_sec_level;
} else
conn->link_mode &= ~HCI_LM_ENCRYPT;
}
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
index d29700d..dfd6891 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
@@ -181,6 +181,18 @@ static void smp_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code, u16 len, void *data)
hci_send_acl(conn->hcon, skb, 0);
}
+static __u8 seclevel_to_authreq(__u8 level)
+{
+ switch (level) {
+ case BT_SECURITY_HIGH:
+ /* Right now we don't support bonding */
+ return SMP_AUTH_MITM;
+
+ default:
+ return SMP_AUTH_NONE;
+ }
+}
+
static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
struct smp_cmd_pairing *cmd, __u8 authreq)
{
@@ -192,7 +204,7 @@ static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
cmd->auth_req = authreq;
}
-static void smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct smp_cmd_pairing *rp = (void *) skb->data;
@@ -202,12 +214,11 @@ static void smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
memcpy(&conn->preq[1], rp, sizeof(*rp));
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rp));
- rp->io_capability = 0x00;
- rp->oob_flag = 0x00;
- rp->max_key_size = 16;
- rp->init_key_dist = 0x00;
- rp->resp_key_dist = 0x00;
- rp->auth_req &= (SMP_AUTH_BONDING | SMP_AUTH_MITM);
+ if (rp->oob_flag)
+ return SMP_OOB_NOT_AVAIL;
+
+ /* We didn't start the pairing, so no requirements */
+ build_pairing_cmd(conn, rp, SMP_AUTH_NONE);
/* Just works */
memset(conn->tk, 0, sizeof(conn->tk));
@@ -216,9 +227,11 @@ static void smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
memcpy(&conn->prsp[1], rp, sizeof(*rp));
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP, sizeof(*rp), rp);
+
+ return 0;
}
-static void smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct smp_cmd_pairing *rp = (void *) skb->data;
struct smp_cmd_pairing_confirm cp;
@@ -228,29 +241,34 @@ static void smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
+ skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rp));
+
+ if (rp->oob_flag)
+ return SMP_OOB_NOT_AVAIL;
+
/* Just works */
memset(conn->tk, 0, sizeof(conn->tk));
conn->prsp[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP;
memcpy(&conn->prsp[1], rp, sizeof(*rp));
- skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rp));
ret = smp_rand(conn->prnd);
if (ret)
- return;
+ return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
ret = smp_c1(tfm, conn->tk, conn->prnd, conn->preq, conn->prsp, 0,
conn->src, conn->hcon->dst_type, conn->dst, res);
if (ret)
- return;
+ return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
swap128(res, cp.confirm_val);
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM, sizeof(cp), &cp);
+
+ return 0;
}
-static void smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm = conn->hcon->hdev->tfm;
@@ -272,21 +290,23 @@ static void smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
ret = smp_rand(conn->prnd);
if (ret)
- return;
+ return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
ret = smp_c1(tfm, conn->tk, conn->prnd, conn->preq, conn->prsp,
conn->hcon->dst_type, conn->dst,
0, conn->src, res);
if (ret)
- return;
+ return SMP_CONFIRM_FAILED;
swap128(res, cp.confirm_val);
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM, sizeof(cp), &cp);
}
+
+ return 0;
}
-static void smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
struct crypto_blkcipher *tfm = hcon->hdev->tfm;
@@ -307,19 +327,15 @@ static void smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
conn->hcon->dst_type, conn->dst, 0, conn->src,
res);
if (ret)
- return;
+ return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
BT_DBG("conn %p %s", conn, conn->hcon->out ? "master" : "slave");
swap128(res, confirm);
if (memcmp(conn->pcnf, confirm, sizeof(conn->pcnf)) != 0) {
- struct smp_cmd_pairing_fail cp;
-
BT_ERR("Pairing failed (confirmation values mismatch)");
- cp.reason = SMP_CONFIRM_FAILED;
- smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_FAIL, sizeof(cp), &cp);
- return;
+ return SMP_CONFIRM_FAILED;
}
if (conn->hcon->out) {
@@ -341,9 +357,11 @@ static void smp_cmd_pairing_random(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
smp_s1(tfm, conn->tk, conn->prnd, random, key);
swap128(key, hcon->ltk);
}
+
+ return 0;
}
-static void smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
+static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct smp_cmd_security_req *rp = (void *) skb->data;
struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
@@ -352,17 +370,12 @@ static void smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
if (test_bit(HCI_CONN_ENCRYPT_PEND, &hcon->pend))
- return;
+ return 0;
skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rp));
- memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
- cp.io_capability = 0x00;
- cp.oob_flag = 0x00;
- cp.max_key_size = 16;
- cp.init_key_dist = 0x00;
- cp.resp_key_dist = 0x00;
- cp.auth_req = rp->auth_req & (SMP_AUTH_BONDING | SMP_AUTH_MITM);
+ memset(&cp, 0, sizeof(cp));
+ build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, rp->auth_req);
conn->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
memcpy(&conn->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp));
@@ -370,18 +383,8 @@ static void smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp);
set_bit(HCI_CONN_ENCRYPT_PEND, &hcon->pend);
-}
-static __u8 seclevel_to_authreq(__u8 level)
-{
- switch (level) {
- case BT_SECURITY_HIGH:
- /* For now we don't support bonding */
- return SMP_AUTH_MITM;
-
- default:
- return SMP_AUTH_NONE;
- }
+ return 0;
}
int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level)
@@ -407,13 +410,8 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level)
if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) {
struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
- cp.io_capability = 0x00;
- cp.oob_flag = 0x00;
- cp.max_key_size = 16;
- cp.init_key_dist = 0x00;
- cp.resp_key_dist = 0x00;
- cp.auth_req = authreq;
+ build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, authreq);
conn->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ;
memcpy(&conn->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp));
@@ -446,26 +444,28 @@ int smp_sig_channel(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
switch (code) {
case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ:
- smp_cmd_pairing_req(conn, skb);
+ reason = smp_cmd_pairing_req(conn, skb);
break;
case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_FAIL:
+ reason = 0;
+ err = -EPERM;
break;
case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP:
- smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(conn, skb);
+ reason = smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(conn, skb);
break;
case SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ:
- smp_cmd_security_req(conn, skb);
+ reason = smp_cmd_security_req(conn, skb);
break;
case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM:
- smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(conn, skb);
+ reason = smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(conn, skb);
break;
case SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM:
- smp_cmd_pairing_random(conn, skb);
+ reason = smp_cmd_pairing_random(conn, skb);
break;
case SMP_CMD_ENCRYPT_INFO:
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
