Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Add BT_POWER L2CAP socket option.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jaikumar,

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Jaikumar Ganesh <jaikumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Luiz, Ville:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jaikumar,
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi Jaikumar,
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 06:06:04PM -0700, ext Jaikumar Ganesh wrote:
>> >> Add BT_POWER socket option used to control the power
>> >> characteristics of the underlying ACL link. When the remote end
>> >> has put the link in sniff mode and the host stack wants to send
>> >> data we need need to explicitly exit sniff mode to work well with
>> >> certain devices (For example, A2DP on Plantronics Voyager 855).
>> >> However, this causes problems with HID devices.
>> >>
>> >> Hence, moving into active mode when sending data, irrespective
>> >> of who set the sniff mode has been made as a socket option. By
>> >> default, we will move into active mode. HID devices can set the
>> >> L2CAP socket option to prevent this from happening.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I would prefer keeping old way the default way. Otherwise you need to update
>> > all socket users in user space. Other that that this looks good to me.
>>
>> What is wrong that we need such control to be done in userspace?
>
> I don't think my emails reached the list so sending it again.
>
> Ville:
>    Its the other way round. With this approach and the default value,
> only the HID
> userspace socket needs to be modified - nothing else.
>
> Luiz:
>    The HID devices can send data even when in sniff mode and hence we
> need to change the userspace
> L2CAP socket option. While sending data without exiting sniff mode for
> A2DP for example, causes problems
> as explained in the commit message.

Now I get it, we should definitely fix it for a2dp/hfp, but still
introducing new socket options it is a quite dangerous game, I wonder
how much power do we really save in case of HID and at what cost since
it probably add latency to input devices while on sniff mode.

-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Computer Engineer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux