Hi Luiz,
On 2024/11/20 22:20, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
Hi Jiayang,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:18 AM Jiayang Mao <quic_jiaymao@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
bt_gatt_client_set_security could fail if the security level in
kernel is already BT_ATT_SECURITY_MEDIUM but long term key is not
ready. So, get and check the security level before setting it.
Ive already pushed a similar fix.
I just saw your fix. Thank you very much for the update!
Signed-off-by: Jiayang Mao <quic_jiaymao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/shared/att.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/att.c b/src/shared/att.c
index 4a406f4b9..dabbdb431 100644
--- a/src/shared/att.c
+++ b/src/shared/att.c
@@ -727,6 +727,9 @@ static bool bt_att_chan_set_security(struct bt_att_chan *chan, int level)
{
struct bt_security sec;
+ if (level == bt_att_chan_get_security(chan))
+ return true;
+
if (chan->type == BT_ATT_LOCAL) {
chan->sec_level = level;
return true;
--
2.25.1