On 11/15/2024 6:01 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:26:56PM -0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>> Download board id specific NVM instead of default for WCN6855 if board
>> id is available, and that is required by Lenovo ThinkPad X13s.
>>
>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Aiqun Yu (Maria) <quic_aiquny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Cheng Jiang <quic_chejiang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@xxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This works like a charm on my X13s which has the GF variant.
>
> Unlike with the "default" NVM file, the range is excellent with the
> board-specific file now pushed to linux-firmware (similar to what I see
> when using the Windows driver NVM file). Specifically, the range with
> the headphones I use for testing increases from about two meters to 20 m
> (around a bend).
>
> Even if these NVM files didn't make it into the November release of
> linux-firmware and therefore won't make it into the distros for another
> month, I think we should mark this one as a fix and backport it to
> stable as soon as possible.
>
> Zijun, could you amend the commit message with some details about why
> this needs to be fixed and backported (e.g. refer to my range example
> above)?
>
will do it within v2 as you suggest.
> Fixes: 095327fede00 ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for QTI Bluetooth chip wcn6855")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.4
>
> It's possible to add a comment after the stable tag to delay backporting
> until the next linux-firmware release, but in this case it may be better
> to break existing setups and force people to update to the correct radio
> calibration data.
>
i would like to temporarily add fallback logic within v2, then i will
help to backport it ASAP without breaking existing setups even if the
current default NVM are not for WCN6855.
> Either way:
>
> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
thank you johan for verification and suggestion.
(^^)(^^)
>
> Johan
