Re: [PATCH net 1/4] bluetooth: Improve setsockopt() handling of malformed user input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-11-14 15:27, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> The bt_copy_from_sockptr() return value is being misinterpreted by most
> users: a non-zero result is mistakenly assumed to represent an error code,
> but actually indicates the number of bytes that could not be copied.
> 
> Remove bt_copy_from_sockptr() and adapt callers to use
> copy_safe_from_sockptr().
> 
> For sco_sock_setsockopt() (case BT_CODEC) use copy_struct_from_sockptr() to
> scrub parts of uninitialized buffer.
> 
> Opportunistically, rename `len` to `optlen` in hci_sock_setsockopt_old()
> and hci_sock_setsockopt().
> 
> Fixes: 51eda36d33e4 ("Bluetooth: SCO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Fixes: a97de7bff13b ("Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Fixes: 4f3951242ace ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Fixes: 9e8742cdfc4b ("Bluetooth: ISO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Fixes: b2186061d604 ("Bluetooth: hci_sock: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h |  9 ---------
>  net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c          | 14 +++++++-------
>  net/bluetooth/iso.c               | 10 +++++-----
>  net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c        | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c       |  9 ++++-----
>  net/bluetooth/sco.c               | 11 ++++++-----
>  6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
...
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> index f48250e3f2e103c75d5937e1608e43c123aa3297..1001fb4cc21c0ecc7bcdd3ea9041770ede4f27b8 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> @@ -629,10 +629,9 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname,
>  
>  	switch (optname) {
>  	case RFCOMM_LM:
> -		if (bt_copy_from_sockptr(&opt, sizeof(opt), optval, optlen)) {
> -			err = -EFAULT;
> +		err = copy_safe_from_sockptr(&opt, sizeof(opt), optval, optlen);
> +		if (err)
>  			break;
> -		}

This will return a positive integer if copy_safe_from_sockptr() fails.
Shouldn't this be:

err = -EFAULT;
if (copy_safe_from_sockptr(&opt, sizeof(opt), optval, optlen))
	break;




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux