dedicated -fixes branch in the bt tree (was: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: btusb: Fix not being able to reconnect after suspend)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[CCing Stephen JFYI]

On 16.10.24 07:12, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> Thank you for the patch.

+1

>> Fixes: 81b3e33bb054 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Don't fail external suspend
>> requests")
> 
> That commit is not in the master branch,
> 610712298b11b2914be00b35abe9326b5dbb62c8 is.

Luiz, please allow me to ask: is there a reason why the bluetooth tree
does not use a dedicated "-fixes" branch like many other subsystems do?
That would avoid mishaps like the one above and all those "duplicate
patches in the bluetooth tree" messages Stephen has to sent every few
weeks
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=f%3Astephen+duplicate+%22bluetooth+tree%22
); reminder, you can have both your -fixes and your -for-next branch in
linux-next for test coverage.

Ciao, Thorsten




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux