On 14/08/2024 00:11, Felix Kaechele wrote: > Thanks for taking a look, Krzysztof. > > In this case I think it would be easiest to just use the existing > qca9377 fallback and drop his part of the patchset. You need then other patchset documenting new compatible with fallback. Compatibles are always specific. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc1/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst > > As for the supplies: For the particular module I am working with the > supplies are mostly shared with the WiFi side. So it "just works" > without taking care of supplies on the BT side. You still should describe the hardware. > > But I agree it would be more correct to add and handle these as well. > The documentation I have access to through the FCC filing of this module > is not really conclusive of how to correctly name them in this context. > I would rather avoid submitting a patch with incorrect supply names. OK Best regards, Krzysztof
