Re: [PATCH] Adjust timeout LE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arun,

On 02/03/11 17:50, Arun Kumar SINGH wrote:
Hi Marco,



The hci_send_req 100ms
timeout is not enough when
the chip is in deep
sleep.
This patch increases it to
1000ms.

From: Marco Sinigaglia,
marco.sinigaglia@xxxxxxx
---
lib/hci.c         |    6
+++---
tools/hciconfig.c |    2 +-
2 files changed, 4
insertions(+), 4 deletions(-
)

diff --git a/lib/hci.c
b/lib/hci.c
index 02fc0cf..96fafe1
100644
--- a/lib/hci.c
+++ b/lib/hci.c
@@ -2753,7 +2753,7 @@ int
hci_le_set_scan_enable(int
dd, uint8_t enable,
uint8_t filter_dup)
         rq.rparam =
&status;
         rq.rlen = 1;

-       if (hci_send_req(dd,
&rq, 100)<  0)
+       if (hci_send_req(dd,
&rq, 1000)<  0)
                 return -1;

         if (status) {
@@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ int
hci_le_set_scan_parameters(i
nt dd, uint8_t type,
         rq.rparam =
&status;
         rq.rlen = 1;

-       if (hci_send_req(dd,
&rq, 100)<  0)
+       if (hci_send_req(dd,
&rq, 1000)<  0)
                 return -1;

         if (status) {
@@ -2815,7 +2815,7 @@ int
hci_le_set_advertise_enable(
int dd, uint8_t
enable)
         rq.rparam =
&status;
         rq.rlen = 1;

-       if (hci_send_req(dd,
&rq, 100)<  0)
+       if (hci_send_req(dd,
&rq, 1000)<  0)
                 return -1;

         if (status) {
diff --git
a/tools/hciconfig.c
b/tools/hciconfig.c
index 05a8910..aa6d009
100644
--- a/tools/hciconfig.c
+++ b/tools/hciconfig.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static
void cmd_le_adv(int ctl, int
hdev, char *opt)
         rq.rparam =
&status;
         rq.rlen = 1;

-       ret =
hci_send_req(dd,&rq, 100);
+       ret =
hci_send_req(dd,&rq, 1000);

         hci_close_dev(dd);
Shouldn't the to parameter be passed to hci_le_set_scan_enable(...) rather than hard-coding it and passing it to hci_send_req(as 1000)?
I see that as the logical way for all hci_* functions in hci.c that eventually call hci_send_req(). hci_le_set_scan_parameters and few others yet don't have to as input argument and should be patched suitably ...


Thanks,
Arun


  To report this email as spam click https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg== .
I do agree Arun, I will change the code as you suggest.

Cheers
Marco



Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux