Hi, On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:34 AM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16.04.24 17:10, patchwork-bot+bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > This patch was applied to bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git (master) > > by Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:19:22 +0800 you wrote: > >> Because both MT7920 and MT7921 use the same chip ID. > >> We use the 8th bit of fw_flavor to distingush MT7920. > >> The original patch made a mistake to check whole fw_flavor, > >> that makes the condition both true (dev_id == 0x7961 && fw_flavor), > >> and makes MT7921 flow wrong. > >> > >> In this patch, we correct the flow to get the 8th bit value for MT7920. > >> And the patch is verified pass with both MT7920 and MT7921. > >> > >> [...] > > > > Here is the summary with links: > > - Bluetooth: btusb: Fix the patch for MT7920 the affected to MT7921 > > https://git.kernel.org/bluetooth/bluetooth-next/c/263296438807 > > Hi! 6.9 is only days close and this is fixing a 6.9 regression, so allow > me to quickly ask: do you still plan to submit this for mainline merge > soon? Or did you already and I just missed it? Ciao, Thorsten It wasn't marked with Fixes or stable though which is what I usually use as an indicator to backport. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz
