On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 02:21:47PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:08 AM Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The default device address apparently comes from the NVM configuration
> > file and can differ quite a bit between controllers.
> >
> > Store the default address when parsing the configuration file and use it
> > to determine whether the controller has been provisioned with an
> > address.
> >
> > This makes sure that devices without a unique address start as
> > unconfigured unless a valid address has been provided in the devicetree.
> >
> > Fixes: 00567f70051a ("Bluetooth: qca: fix invalid device address check")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.5
> > Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Janaki Ramaiah Thota <quic_janathot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> I can confirm that my sc7180-trogdor-based devices manage to detect
> the default address after this series and thus still look to the
> device-tree for their address. Thus:
>
> Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for testing, Doug.
> I'll continue to note that I still wish that detecting the default
> address wasn't important for trogdor. I still feel that the fact that
> they have a valid BT address stored in their device tree (populated by
> firmware) should take precedence. ...but I won't insist.
When I can find the time, I'll look into at least dropping the BD_ADDR
quirk in favour of always looking in the devicetree when we do not have
a valid address. That may be a good time to revisit the question whether
the devicetree should always override the controller's address too.
Johan
