On 29/04/2024 22:44, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 4/29/24 8:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 29/04/2024 17:10, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 3/19/24 6:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 19/03/2024 05:20, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>> CYW43439 is a Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo device from Infineon. >>>>> The Bluetooth part is capable of Bluetooth 5.2 BR/EDR/LE . >>>>> This chip is present e.g. on muRata 1YN module. >>>>> >>>>> Extend the binding with its DT compatible using fallback >>>>> compatible string to "brcm,bcm4329-bt" which seems to be >>>>> the oldest compatible device. This should also prevent the >>>>> growth of compatible string tables in drivers. The existing >>>>> block of compatible strings is retained. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Is there any action necessary from me to get this applied ? >> >> I recommend resending with proper PATCH prefix matching net-next >> expectations. > > I don't think bluetooth is net-next , it has its own ML and its own True, indeed. The net prefix confused me. Best regards, Krzysztof
