On 4/24/2024 1:37 PM, Wren Turkal wrote:
> On 4/23/24 10:02 PM, quic_zijuhu wrote:
>> On 4/24/2024 12:30 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 24/04/2024 06:26, Zijun Hu wrote:
>>>> Commit 56d074d26c58 ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: don't use IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
>>>> with gpiod_get_optional()") will cause below serious regression issue:
>>>>
>>>> BT can't be enabled any more after below steps:
>>>> cold boot -> enable BT -> disable BT -> BT enable failure
>>>> if property enable-gpios is not configured within DT|ACPI for QCA6390.
>>>>
>>>> The commit wrongly changes flag @power_ctrl_enabled set logic for this
>>>> case as shown by its below code applet and causes this serious issue.
>>>> qcadev->bt_en = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&serdev->dev, "enable",
>>>> GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>>>> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(qcadev->bt_en)) {
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(qcadev->bt_en)) {
>>>> dev_warn(&serdev->dev, "failed to acquire enable gpio\n");
>>>> power_ctrl_enabled = false;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Fixed by reverting the mentioned commit for QCA6390.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 56d074d26c58 ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: don't use IS_ERR_OR_NULL()
>>>> with gpiod_get_optional()")
>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Reported-by: Wren Turkal <wt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218726
>>>> Link:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/ea20bb9b-6b60-47fc-ae42-5eed918ad7b4@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m73d6a71d2f454bb03588c66f3ef7912274d37c6f
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Tested-by: Wren Turkal <wt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes:
>>>> V6 -> V7: Add stable tag
>>>
>>> Stop sending multiple pathchsets per day. I already asked you to first
>>> finish discussion and then send new version. You again start sending
>>> something while previous discussion is going.
>>> you concern is wrong and i am sure it don't block me sending new patch
>> sets to solve other issue. so i send this v7.
>>
>> i have give reply for Bartosz' patch.
>>
>> i hop you as DTS expert to notice my concern about DTS in the reply.
>
> Are you saying here (1) that you identified a problem in the DTs that
> you hope Krzysztof notices or (2) that you want Krzysztof to notice how
> your description of way that DT declares the gpio as required affects
> your proposed change. As a native American English speaker, I am finding
> your text hard to follow.
>
1) is my purpose. i have given my concern about DTS for Bartosz' patch
and hope DTS expert notice the concern.
my change don't have any such concern about DTS usage. that is why i
changed my fix from original reverting the whole wrong commit to now
focusing on QCA6390.
> I think you are saying #2.
>
> I just want to make sure I am following the discussion here.
>
> wt
