On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 at 12:42, Wren Turkal <wt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/22/24 1:51 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > This all sounds plausible. However just reverting this patch is a > > waste of time as checking IS_ERR_OR_NULL() on the return value of > > gpiod_get_optional() and continuing on error is wrong as I explained > > several times under Ziju's emails already. I provided a suggestion: > > bail out on error returned from gpiod_get_optional() even if the > > driver could technically continue in some cases. I don't want to have > > to argue this anymore. > > I'm not trying to argue. I am trying to find a path forward as a > concerned user. I am also trying to figure out if there is any way I can > help resolve this. I am not a kernel developer, but I would really like > to contribute in some way, if possible. > Can you test the patch[1] I just sent? Bart [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20240422130036.31856-1-brgl@xxxxxxxx/
