On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qca6390.c b/drivers/power/sequencing/pwrseq-qca6390.c
[..]
> +static int pwrseq_qca6390_power_on(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq)
> +{
> + struct pwrseq_qca6390_ctx *ctx = pwrseq_device_get_data(pwrseq);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ctx->pdata->num_vregs, ctx->regs);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->bt_gpio, 1);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->wlan_gpio, 1);
So it's no longer possible to power these independently?
> +
> + if (ctx->pdata->pwup_delay_msec)
> + msleep(ctx->pdata->pwup_delay_msec);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pwrseq_qca6390_power_off(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq)
> +{
> + struct pwrseq_qca6390_ctx *ctx = pwrseq_device_get_data(pwrseq);
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->bt_gpio, 0);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->wlan_gpio, 0);
> +
The answer that was provided recently was that the WiFi and BT modules
absolutely must be modelled together, because there must be a 100ms
delay between bt_gpio going low and wlan_gpio going high.
If you're not going to address that concern, then I fail to see the
reason for adding the power sequence framework - just let the BT and
PCI power control (WiFi) do their thing independently.
> + return regulator_bulk_disable(ctx->pdata->num_vregs, ctx->regs);
> +}
> +
> +static int pwrseq_qca6390_match(struct pwrseq_device *pwrseq,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pwrseq_qca6390_ctx *ctx = pwrseq_device_get_data(pwrseq);
> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev->of_node;
> +
> + /*
> + * The PMU supplies power to the Bluetooth and WLAN modules. both
> + * consume the PMU AON output so check the presence of the
> + * 'vddaon-supply' property and whether it leads us to the right
> + * device.
> + */
> + if (!of_property_present(dev_node, "vddaon-supply"))
> + return 0;
> +
> + struct device_node *reg_node __free(of_node) =
> + of_parse_phandle(dev_node, "vddaon-supply", 0);
> + if (!reg_node)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * `reg_node` is the PMU AON regulator, its parent is the `regulators`
> + * node and finally its grandparent is the PMU device node that we're
> + * looking for.
> + */
> + if (!reg_node->parent || !reg_node->parent->parent ||
> + reg_node->parent->parent != ctx->of_node)
> + return 0;
Your DeviceTree example gives a sense that a set of supplies feeds the
PMU, which then supplies power to the BT and WiFi nodes through some
entity that can switch power on and off, and adjust the voltage level.
Then comes this function, which indicates that the DeviceTree model was
just for show.
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int pwrseq_qca6390_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct pwrseq_qca6390_ctx *ctx;
> + struct pwrseq_config config;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ctx->of_node = dev->of_node;
> +
> + ctx->pdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!ctx->pdata)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
> + "Failed to obtain platform data\n");
> +
> + if (ctx->pdata->vregs) {
> + ctx->regs = devm_kcalloc(dev, ctx->pdata->num_vregs,
> + sizeof(*ctx->regs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctx->regs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ctx->pdata->num_vregs; i++)
> + ctx->regs[i].supply = ctx->pdata->vregs[i].name;
> +
> + ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, ctx->pdata->num_vregs,
> + ctx->regs);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "Failed to get all regulators\n");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ctx->pdata->num_vregs; i++) {
> + if (!ctx->pdata->vregs[1].load_uA)
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = regulator_set_load(ctx->regs[i].consumer,
> + ctx->pdata->vregs[i].load_uA);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> + "Failed to set vreg load\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> + ctx->bt_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "bt-enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
Why are these optional? Does it make sense to have a qca6390 without
both of these gpios connected?
Regards,
Bjorn
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->bt_gpio))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ctx->bt_gpio),
> + "Failed to get the Bluetooth enable GPIO\n");
> +
> + ctx->wlan_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "wlan-enable",
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->wlan_gpio))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ctx->wlan_gpio),
> + "Failed to get the WLAN enable GPIO\n");
> +
> + memset(&config, 0, sizeof(config));
> +
> + config.parent = dev;
> + config.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + config.drvdata = ctx;
> + config.match = pwrseq_qca6390_match;
> + config.power_on = pwrseq_qca6390_power_on;
> + config.power_off = pwrseq_qca6390_power_off;
> +
> + ctx->pwrseq = devm_pwrseq_device_register(dev, &config);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->pwrseq))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(ctx->pwrseq),
> + "Failed to register the power sequencer\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id pwrseq_qca6390_of_match[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "qcom,qca6390-pmu",
> + .data = &pwrseq_qca6390_of_data,
> + },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pwrseq_qca6390_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver pwrseq_qca6390_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "pwrseq-qca6390",
> + .of_match_table = pwrseq_qca6390_of_match,
> + },
> + .probe = pwrseq_qca6390_probe,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(pwrseq_qca6390_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCA6390 PMU power sequencing driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 2.40.1
>
