Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Disconnect devices before rfkilling adapter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Luiz,

On 1/8/24 19:05, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
Hi Jonas,

On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 1:03 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Apparently the firmware is supposed to power off the bluetooth card
properly, including disconnecting devices, when we use rfkill to block
bluetooth. This doesn't work on a lot of laptops though, leading to weird
issues after turning off bluetooth, like the connection timing out on the
peripherals which were connected, and bluetooth not connecting properly
when the adapter is turned on again after rfkilling.

This series uses the rfkill hook in the bluetooth subsystem
to execute a few more shutdown commands and make sure that all
devices get disconnected before we close the HCI connection to the adapter.

---

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20240102133311.6712-1-verdre@xxxxxxx/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20240102181946.57288-1-verdre@xxxxxxx/
v3:
  - Update commit message titles to reflect what's actually happening
    (disconnecting devices, not sending a power-off command).
  - Doing the shutdown sequence synchronously instead of async now.
  - Move HCI_RFKILLED flag back again to be set before shutdown.
  - Added a "fallback" hci_dev_do_close() to the error path because
    hci_set_powered_sync() might bail-out early on error.

Jonas Dreßler (4):
   Bluetooth: Remove HCI_POWER_OFF_TIMEOUT
   Bluetooth: mgmt: Remove leftover queuing of power_off work
   Bluetooth: Add new state HCI_POWERING_DOWN
   Bluetooth: Disconnect connected devices before rfkilling adapter

  include/net/bluetooth/hci.h |  2 +-
  net/bluetooth/hci_core.c    | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  net/bluetooth/hci_sync.c    | 16 +++++++++++-----
  net/bluetooth/mgmt.c        | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
  4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

--
2.43.0

I will probably be applying this sortly, but let's try to add tests to
mgmt-tester just to make sure we don't introduce regressions later,
btw it seems there are a few suspend test that do connect, for
example:

Suspend - Success 5 (Pairing - Legacy) - waiting 1 seconds
random: crng init done
   New connection with handle 0x002a
   Test condition complete, 1 left
Suspend - Success 5 (Pairing - Legacy) - waiting done
   Set the system into Suspend via force_suspend
   New Controller Suspend event received
   Test condition complete, 0 left


Thanks for that hint, I've been starting to write a test and managed to
write to the rfkill file and it's blocking the device just fine, except
I've run into what might be a bug in the virtual HCI driver:

So the power down sequence is initiated on the rfkill as expected and
hci_set_powered_sync(false) is called. That then calls
hci_write_scan_enable_sync(), and this HCI command never gets a response
from the virtual HCI driver. Strangely, BT_HCI_CMD_WRITE_SCAN_ENABLE is
implemented in btdev.c and the callback does get executed (I checked), it
just doesn't send the command completed event:

< HCI Command: Write Scan Enable (0x03|0x001a) plen 1                                                                                                                                       #1588 [hci1] 12.294234
        Scan enable: No Scans (0x00)

no response after...

Below is my current mgmt-tester patch adding the test:

diff --git a/tools/mgmt-tester.c b/tools/mgmt-tester.c
index 7dfd1b0c7..2095b7203 100644
--- a/tools/mgmt-tester.c
+++ b/tools/mgmt-tester.c
@@ -12439,6 +12439,30 @@ static const struct generic_data suspend_resume_success_5 = {
 	.expect_alt_ev_len = sizeof(suspend_state_param_disconnect),
 };
+static const uint8_t rfkill_hci_disconnect_device[] = {
+   0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x01, 0xaa, 0x00, 0x00,
+   0x05,
+};
+
+static const uint8_t rfkill_new_settings_ev[] = {
+   0x92, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+};
+
+
+static const struct generic_data rfkill_disconnect_devices = {
+	.setup_settings = settings_powered_connectable_bondable,
+	.pin = pair_device_pin,
+	.pin_len = sizeof(pair_device_pin),
+	.client_pin = pair_device_pin,
+	.client_pin_len = sizeof(pair_device_pin),
+	.expect_hci_command = BT_HCI_CMD_DISCONNECT,
+	.expect_hci_param = rfkill_hci_disconnect_device,
+	.expect_hci_len = sizeof(rfkill_hci_disconnect_device),
+	.expect_alt_ev = MGMT_EV_NEW_SETTINGS,
+	.expect_alt_ev_param = rfkill_new_settings_ev,
+	.expect_alt_ev_len = sizeof(rfkill_new_settings_ev),
+};
+
 static void trigger_force_suspend(void *user_data)
 {
 	struct test_data *data = tester_get_data();
@@ -12454,6 +12478,81 @@ static void trigger_force_suspend(void *user_data)
 	}
 }
+enum rfkill_type {
+	RFKILL_TYPE_ALL = 0,
+	RFKILL_TYPE_WLAN,
+	RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH,
+	RFKILL_TYPE_UWB,
+	RFKILL_TYPE_WIMAX,
+	RFKILL_TYPE_WWAN,
+};
+
+enum rfkill_operation {
+	RFKILL_OP_ADD = 0,
+	RFKILL_OP_DEL,
+	RFKILL_OP_CHANGE,
+	RFKILL_OP_CHANGE_ALL,
+};
+
+struct rfkill_event {
+	uint32_t idx;
+	uint8_t  type;
+	uint8_t  op;
+	uint8_t  soft;
+	uint8_t  hard;
+};
+#define RFKILL_EVENT_SIZE_V1    8
+
+static void trigger_rfkill(void *user_data)
+{
+	int fd;
+	int latest_rfkill_idx;
+        struct rfkill_event write_event;
+        ssize_t l;
+
+	tester_print("Triggering rfkill block of hci device");
+
+	fd = open("/dev/rfkill", O_RDWR|O_CLOEXEC|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		tester_warn("Failed to open RFKILL control device");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	latest_rfkill_idx = -1;
+	while (1) {
+		struct rfkill_event event = { 0 };
+		ssize_t len;
+
+		len = read(fd, &event, sizeof(event));
+		if (len < RFKILL_EVENT_SIZE_V1)
+			break;
+
+		if (event.type == RFKILL_TYPE_BLUETOOTH)
+			latest_rfkill_idx = event.idx;
+	}
+
+	if (latest_rfkill_idx < 0) {
+		tester_warn("No rfkill device to block found");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	write_event.idx = latest_rfkill_idx;
+	write_event.op = RFKILL_OP_CHANGE;
+	write_event.soft = true;
+	
+        l = write(fd, &write_event, sizeof write_event);
+
+	close(fd);
+
+	if (l < 0) {
+		tester_warn("Failed to execute rfkill op");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if ((size_t)l < RFKILL_EVENT_SIZE_V1)
+		tester_warn("Failed to write to rfkill file");
+}
+
 static void trigger_force_resume(void *user_data)
 {
 	struct test_data *data = tester_get_data();
@@ -12475,6 +12574,12 @@ static void test_suspend_resume_success_5(const void *test_data)
 	tester_wait(1, trigger_force_suspend, NULL);
 }
+static void test_disconnect_on_rfkill(const void *test_data)
+{
+	test_pairing_acceptor(test_data);
+	tester_wait(1, trigger_rfkill, NULL);
+}
+
 static const struct generic_data suspend_resume_success_6 = {
 	.setup_settings = settings_powered_connectable_bondable_ssp,
 	.client_enable_ssp = true,
@@ -14534,6 +14639,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 				&suspend_resume_success_5, NULL,
 				test_suspend_resume_success_5);
+ /* Suspend/Resume
+	 * Setup: Pair.
+	 * Run: Enable suspend
+	 * Expect: Receive the Suspend Event
+	 */
+	test_bredrle("Rfkill - disconnect devices",
+				&rfkill_disconnect_devices, NULL,
+				test_disconnect_on_rfkill);
+
 	/* Suspend/Resume
 	 * Setup: Pair.
 	 * Run: Enable suspend




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux