> On 14-Nov-2023, at 1:28 PM, Hector Martin <marcan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14/11/2023 15.59, Hector Martin wrote: >> On 14/11/2023 15.23, Aditya Garg wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 14-Nov-2023, at 5:01 AM, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 08:57:35PM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote: >>>>> Starting from kernel 6.5, a regression in the kernel is causing Bluetooth to not work on T2 Macs with BCM4377 chip. >>>>> >>>>> Journalctl of kernel 6.4.8 which has Bluetooth working is given here: https://pastebin.com/u9U3kbFJ >>>>> >>>>> Journalctl of kernel 6.5.2, which has Bluetooth broken is given here: https://pastebin.com/aVHNFMRs >>>>> >>>>> Also, the bug hasn’t been fixed even in 6.6.1, as reported by users. >>>> >>>> Can you bisect this regression please? >>> >>> Since I don't have access to this hardware, it's not possible for me to bisect this regression. Let's hope someone is able to do so though. >> >> It's not a regression, it was always broken. I'm sending a patch. >> >> - Hector > > You are quite likely conflating two problems. The ubsan issue you quoted > was always there and the patch I just sent fixes it, but it almost > certainly always worked fine in practice without ubsan. > > The Bluetooth problem you are referring to is likely *specific to > Bluetooth LE devices* and the regression was introduced by 288c90224e > and fixed by 41e9cdea9c, which is also in 6.5.11 and 6.6.1. > > If Bluetooth is broken in *some other way* in 6.6.1 then we need a > proper report or a bisect. Your logs don't show any issues other than > the ubsan noise, which is not a regression. > > - Hector I’ll request users with the hardware to test the patch you sent. Talking about LE devices, I guess I can go ahead testing with the quirk if your patch doesn't Work. >
