Hi Luiz Augusto von Dentz, On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:29:42PM -0700, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > Hi Joeyli, > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 5:25 PM Luiz Augusto von Dentz > <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Joeyli, > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 8:49 AM joeyli <jlee@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Luiz Augusto von Dentz, > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 10:22:26AM -0700, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > > > Hi Chun-Yi, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:43 PM Lee, Chun-Yi <joeyli.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This change is used to relieve CVE-2020-26555. The description of the > > > > > CVE: > > > > > > > > > > Bluetooth legacy BR/EDR PIN code pairing in Bluetooth Core Specification > > > > > 1.0B through 5.2 may permit an unauthenticated nearby device to spoof > > > > > the BD_ADDR of the peer device to complete pairing without knowledge > > > > > of the PIN. [1] > > > > > > > > Btw, it is probably worth mentioning that in BR/EDR the key generation > > > > is actually handled in the controller, below HCI. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the key generation be handled by link manager. I will mention it > > > in patch description. > > > > > > > > The detail of this attack is in IEEE paper: > > > > > BlueMirror: Reflections on Bluetooth Pairing and Provisioning Protocols > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > It's a reflection attack. Base on the paper, attacker can induce the > > > > > attacked target to generate null link key (zero key) without PIN code. > > > > > > > > > > We can ignore null link key in the handler of "Link Key Notification > > > > > event" to relieve the attack. A similar implementation also shows in > > > > > btstack project. [3] > > > > > > > > Perhaps we could clarify this statement by stating that if we ignore > > > > the link key it means the stack will not consider the device is bonded > > > > and will not persist the link key, that said the controller will still > > > > consider it as paired, so I perhaps we should go one step forward and > > > > disconnect if we detect such a key is being used. > > > > > > > > > > I am new on bluetooth field. Did you mean like this patch? Sending > > > HCI_Disconnect when we found zero link key? > > > > > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > > index ff0c331f53d6..3482031cbbb8 100644 > > > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > > @@ -4698,6 +4700,15 @@ static void hci_link_key_notify_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data, > > > if (!conn) > > > goto unlock; > > > > > > + /* Ignore NULL link key against CVE-2020-26555 */ > > > + if (!memcmp(ev->link_key, ZERO_KEY, HCI_LINK_KEY_SIZE)) { > > > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "Ignore NULL link key (ZERO KEY) for %pMR", &ev->bdaddr); > > > + hci_disconnect(conn, HCI_ERROR_AUTH_FAILURE); > > > + hci_conn_drop(conn); > > > + goto unlock; > > > + } > > > > Yeah, something like that should do it, btw I hope you are testing > > these changes do actually work properly, even better if you could > > introduce a test into the likes of mgmt-tester to generate a ZERO_KEY > > so we are not caught by surprise if something doesn't quite work as > > expected, or some change cause a regression where this key is accepted > > again. > > Are you still planning on updating these changes so we can apply it? > Sorry for my delay! I am stucking at other stuff. I will improve the patch and send new version again. THanks a lot! Joey Lee > > > hci_conn_hold(conn); > > > conn->disc_timeout = HCI_DISCONN_TIMEOUT; > > > hci_conn_drop(conn); > > > > > > > > > Is there anything I'm missing? Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > > v2: > > > > > - Used Link: tag instead of Closes: > > > > > - Used bt_dev_dbg instead of BT_DBG > > > > > - Added Fixes: tag > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 55ed8ca10f35 ("Bluetooth: Implement link key handling for the management interface") > > > > > Link: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-26555 [1] > > > > > Link: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9474325/authors#authors [2] > > > > > Link: https://github.com/bluekitchen/btstack/blob/master/src/hci.c#L3722 [3] > > > > > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 6 ++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > > > > index 95816a938cea..ff0c331f53d6 100644 > > > > > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > > > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > > > > > @@ -4684,6 +4684,12 @@ static void hci_link_key_notify_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data, > > > > > bool persistent; > > > > > u8 pin_len = 0; > > > > > > > > > > + /* Ignore NULL link key against CVE-2020-26555 */ > > > > > + if (!memcmp(ev->link_key, ZERO_KEY, HCI_LINK_KEY_SIZE)) { > > > > > + bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "Ignore NULL link key (ZERO KEY) for %pMR", &ev->bdaddr); > > > > > + return; > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > bt_dev_dbg(hdev, ""); > > > > > > > > > > hci_dev_lock(hdev); > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.35.3 > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > Joey Lee > > > > > > > > -- > > Luiz Augusto von Dentz > > > > -- > Luiz Augusto von Dentz