On 14 Jan 2011, at 09:15 , Jose Antonio Santos Cadenas wrote: > 2011/1/14 Jose Antonio Santos Cadenas <jcaden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> 2011/1/14 José Antonio Santos Cadenas <jcaden@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Hi Elvis, >>> >>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:11:04 -0200, Elvis Pfützenreuter wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Elvis Pfutzenreuter <epx@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This patch implements refusal of a MDL reconnection if the new L2CAP >>>> connection presents a different MTU. Accordingly to HDP spec. item 3.5. >>>> >>>> It aims to pass the TC_SNK_HCT_BV_07_C PTS test. (It does not pass yet >>>> because PTS itself seems to have issues. See ticket 7121 for details.) >> > > I finish the tests I'd like to do. Just I'm concerned about why you > are using just OMTU value instead of both values IMTU and OMTU. Will > not be better to store and check both of them? Indeed. I will fix this and submit another round.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
