Re: possible deadlock in rfcomm_sk_state_change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+cc Bluetooth and Networking maintainers

Hi Jiacheng,

On 28/8/22 04:03, Jiacheng Xu wrote:
Hi,

I believe the deadlock is more than possible but actually real.
I got a poc that could stably trigger the deadlock.

poc: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PjqvMtHsrrGM1MIRGKl_zJGR-teAMMQy/view?usp=sharing

Description/Root cause:
In rfcomm_sock_shutdown(), lock_sock() is called when releasing and
shutting down socket.
However, lock_sock() has to be called once more when the sk_state is
changed because the
lock is not always held when rfcomm_sk_state_change() is called. One
such call stack is:

   rfcomm_sock_shutdown():
     lock_sock();
     __rfcomm_sock_close():
       rfcomm_dlc_close():
         __rfcomm_dlc_close():
           rfcomm_dlc_lock();
           rfcomm_sk_state_change():
             lock_sock();

Besides the recursive deadlock, there is also an
issue of a lock hierarchy inversion between rfcomm_dlc_lock() and
lock_sock() if the socket is locked in rfcomm_sk_state_change().


Thanks for the poc and for following the trail all the way to the root cause - this was a known issue and I didn't realize the patch wasn't applied.

> Reference:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211004180734.434511-1-desmondcheongzx@xxxxxxxxx/


Fwiw, I tested the patch again with syzbot. It still applies cleanly to the head of bluetooth-next and seems to address the root cause.

Any thoughts from the maintainers on this issue and the proposed fix?

Best,
Desmond



[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux