Hi All On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 11:08 -0800, Brian Gix wrote: > Trivial addition of ATT API to encode READ_BLOB_REQ pkt. > I apologize for messing up what must seem to be trivial rules for what information to put where in the patches I am trying to get incorporated. This particular patch is in fact a trivial addition to the ATT code, which I believe probably is identical in all respects (including WS I hope) to how anyone else here would have implemented it. My follow on to this will be multi-step GATT procedures, I am going to try as an RFC first, as the concept of GATT procedures that contain more than one ATT Request/Response will be something that undoubtedly will cause people to want to offer input on. I also apologize for the sporadic nature of communication this week, as my workstation had a catastrophic failure which is taking some time to recover from. > -- > Brian Gix > bgix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
