On Monday 06 December 2010, Vitaly Wool wrote: > > As a quick answer to your question: that would depend on the > > difference between the different controllers, I guess. But CG2900 > > doesn't support the LL protocol so it is not an issue for that. > > Right, but if you are only aiming cg2000, why would you create a > framework for that? I initially thought your solution was generic > enough to handle other "many-in-one" Bluetooth chips but I'm > completely unsure about that now. As far as I understand, the point is that it's no longer a 'solution' at the core, i.e. there is no replacement for hci_ldisc or any of these, just modules for the additional h4 protocols that don't have a linux implementation yet. The patch set that was originally posted here had a new framework, but after the comments from Alan and me, Par-Gunnar agreed to use the existing framework instead and extend it in a useful way. Please read all of the discussion we already had. You made a good point here, but I fear you had both Par-Gunnar and me confused because it was a point that already got resolved. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
