Hi Par, On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <pghatwork@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2010/10/29 Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > By the way, I will soon release a new patch set for CG2900 (hopefully > next week), which contains major rework. It's hard to explain > everything here and now but changes include: > - Reuse of existing HCI line discipline under /drivers/bluetooth/. > Line discipline has been modified so it is selectable from protocol if > line discipline should register to Bluetooth stack or not. So is it true that if there's the other chip with similar functionality I have to implement support for, I'll have to pretty much duplicate your line discipline driver? Isn't it better to have a new line discipline that the standard drivers (H4, LL, ...) will be applicable to? ~Vitaly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
