Hi Andrei,
* Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@xxxxxxxxx> [2010-12-01 15:44:50 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Anderson Lizardo
> <anderson.lizardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Andrei,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Emeltchenko Andrei
> > <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> @@ -828,13 +831,14 @@ static void sco_chan_del(struct sock *sk, int err)
> >>
> >> static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
> >> {
> >> - struct sock *parent, *sk;
> >> + struct sock *parent;
> >> + struct sock *sk = conn->sk;
> >
> > I wonder if there is a problem with accessing conn->sk here outside
> > the lock protection?
>
> I believe here is a safe access. We just acquire pointer and possible
> protected operations
> are executed inside lock.
Agreed.
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
