Re: [RFC 00/20] Simple SMP Just Works implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ville,

* Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@xxxxxxxxx> [2010-11-24 07:42:11 +0200]:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:06:16PM -0300, ext Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is an implementation of the Just Works SMP procedure, on top of the work
> > done by Ville (included in this series to give some context). The SMP stuff
> > starts at 11/20.
> > 
> > The most important thing about this series is the discussion that (I hope)
> > it will cause.
> > 
> > Some things that I would like to point (in no order):
> > 
> > - the SMP function names follow the spec nomeclature, would it be better to
> >   use more meaningful names?
> > 
> > - the crypto transform is allocated during the adapter registration, is this
> >   the best place to do this?
> > 
> > - renaming l2cap.c to l2cap_core.c was the only way we could find to keep the
> >   SMP implementation separated from the "core" l2cap.
> 
> Gustavo do you have something against this change?

I'm ok with this change.

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux