Hi Pavan,
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig b/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
> index 02deef4..8e0de9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/Kconfig
> @@ -219,4 +219,14 @@ config BT_ATH3K
> Say Y here to compile support for "Atheros firmware download driver"
> into the kernel or say M to compile it as module (ath3k).
>
> +config BT_WILINK
> + tristate "Texas Instruments WiLink7 driver"
> + depends on TI_ST
> + help
> + This enables the Bluetooth driver for Texas Instrument's BT/FM/GPS
> + combo devices. This makes use of shared transport line discipline
> + core driver to communicate with the BT core of the combo chip.
> +
> + Say Y here to compile support for Texas Instrument's WiLink7 driver
> + into the kernel or say M to compile it as module.
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile b/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
> index 71bdf13..f4460f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/Makefile
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTSDIO) += btsdio.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BT_ATH3K) += ath3k.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BT_MRVL) += btmrvl.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_BT_MRVL_SDIO) += btmrvl_sdio.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_BT_WILINK) += btwilink.o
>
> btmrvl-y := btmrvl_main.o
> btmrvl-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += btmrvl_debugfs.o
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btwilink.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btwilink.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..218efd6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btwilink.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,411 @@
> +/*
> + * Texas Instrument's Bluetooth Driver For Shared Transport.
> + *
> + * Bluetooth Driver acts as interface between HCI core and
> + * TI Shared Transport Layer.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2009-2010 Texas Instruments
> + * Author: Raja Mani <raja_mani@xxxxxx>
> + * Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@xxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
> +#include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/ti_wilink_st.h>
> +
> +/* Bluetooth Driver Version */
> +#define VERSION "1.0"
> +
> +/* Number of seconds to wait for registration completion
> + * when ST returns PENDING status.
> + */
> +#define BT_REGISTER_TIMEOUT 6000 /* 6 sec */
> +
> +/**
> + * struct ti_st - driver operation structure
> + * @hdev: hci device pointer which binds to bt driver
> + * @reg_status: ST registration callback status
> + * @st_write: write function provided by the ST driver
> + * to be used by the driver during send_frame.
> + * @wait_reg_completion - completion sync between ti_st_open
> + * and ti_st_registration_completion_cb.
> + */
> +struct ti_st {
> + struct hci_dev *hdev;
> + char reg_status;
> + long (*st_write) (struct sk_buff *);
> + struct completion wait_reg_completion;
> +};
> +
> +static int reset;
> +
> +/* Increments HCI counters based on pocket ID (cmd,acl,sco) */
> +static inline void ti_st_tx_complete(struct ti_st *hst, int pkt_type)
> +{
> + struct hci_dev *hdev;
> + hdev = hst->hdev;
please do this properly. Just write it like this:
struct hci_dev *hdev = hst->hdev;
+
> + /* Update HCI stat counters */
> + switch (pkt_type) {
> + case HCI_COMMAND_PKT:
> + hdev->stat.cmd_tx++;
> + break;
> +
> + case HCI_ACLDATA_PKT:
> + hdev->stat.acl_tx++;
> + break;
> +
> + case HCI_SCODATA_PKT:
> + hdev->stat.sco_tx++;
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* ------- Interfaces to Shared Transport ------ */
> +
> +/* Called by ST layer to indicate protocol registration completion
> + * status.ti_st_open() function will wait for signal from this
> + * API when st_register() function returns ST_PENDING.
> + */
> +static void st_registration_completion_cb(void *priv_data, char data)
> +{
> + struct ti_st *lhst = priv_data;
> +
> + /* Save registration status for use in ti_st_open() */
> + lhst->reg_status = data;
> + /* complete the wait in ti_st_open() */
> + complete(&lhst->wait_reg_completion);
> +}
> +
> +/* Called by Shared Transport layer when receive data is
> + * available */
> +static long st_receive(void *priv_data, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct ti_st *lhst = priv_data;
I really prefer if the variable with the assignment comes first.
> + if (!skb)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (!lhst) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + skb->dev = (struct net_device *)lhst->hdev;
Don't do this cast. See the other drivers where we just use (void *)
cast.
> + /* Forward skb to HCI core layer */
> + err = hci_recv_frame(skb);
> + if (err) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + BT_ERR("Unable to push skb to HCI core(%d)", err);
> + return err;
> + }
So first of all, I prefer if you check like this:
if (err < 0) {
And then second, you are double freeing the SKB here. The hci_recv_frame
will free the SKB in an error case.
> +
> + lhst->hdev->stat.byte_rx += skb->len;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* ------- Interfaces to HCI layer ------ */
> +/* protocol structure registered with shared transport */
> +static struct st_proto_s ti_st_proto = {
> + .type = ST_BT,
> + .recv = st_receive,
> + .reg_complete_cb = st_registration_completion_cb,
> + .priv_data = NULL,
> +};
Please don't bother with NULL assignment. It should not be needed.
> +/* Called from HCI core to initialize the device */
> +static int ti_st_open(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + unsigned long timeleft;
> + struct ti_st *hst;
> + int err;
> +
> + BT_DBG("%s %p", hdev->name, hdev);
> +
> + /* provide contexts for callbacks from ST */
> + hst = hdev->driver_data;
> + ti_st_proto.priv_data = hst;
> +
> + err = st_register(&ti_st_proto);
> + if (err == -EINPROGRESS) {
> + /* Prepare wait-for-completion handler data structures.
> + * Needed to synchronize this and
> + * st_registration_completion_cb() functions.
> + */
> + init_completion(&hst->wait_reg_completion);
> +
> + /* Reset ST registration callback status flag , this value
> + * will be updated in ti_st_registration_completion_cb()
> + * function whenever it called from ST driver.
> + */
> + hst->reg_status = -EINPROGRESS;
> +
> + /* ST is busy with either protocol registration or firmware
> + * download. Wait until the registration callback is called
> + */
> + BT_DBG(" waiting for registration completion signal from ST");
> +
> + timeleft = wait_for_completion_timeout
> + (&hst->wait_reg_completion,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(BT_REGISTER_TIMEOUT));
> + if (!timeleft) {
> + BT_ERR("Timeout(%d sec),didn't get reg "
> + "completion signal from ST",
> + BT_REGISTER_TIMEOUT / 1000);
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + /* Is ST registration callback called with ERROR status? */
> + if (hst->reg_status != 0) {
> + BT_ERR("ST registration completed with invalid "
> + "status %d", hst->reg_status);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> + err = 0;
> + } else if (err == -EPERM) {
> + BT_ERR("st_register failed %d", err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + hst->st_write = ti_st_proto.write;
> + if (!hst->st_write) {
> + BT_ERR("undefined ST write function");
> +
> + /* Undo registration with ST */
> + err = st_unregister(ST_BT);
> + if (err)
> + BT_ERR("st_unregister() failed with error %d", err);
> +
> + hst->st_write = NULL;
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + /* Registration with ST layer is successful,
> + * hardware is ready to accept commands from HCI core.
> + */
> + set_bit(HCI_RUNNING, &hdev->flags);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
I really don't like what you are doing here. So please use
test_and_set_bit and clear it in an error case.
Also you need to handle all error cases. Just not only two.
Where is the ti_st_proto.write coming from?
> +
> +/* Close device */
> +static int ti_st_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct ti_st *hst = hdev->driver_data;
> +
> + /* continue to unregister from transport */
> + err = st_unregister(ST_BT);
> + if (err)
> + BT_ERR("st_unregister() failed with error %d", err);
> +
> + hst->st_write = NULL;
> +
> + return err;
> +}
You need a test_and_clear_bit for HCI_RUNNING. There is a huge imbalance
here. Have you tested this with consecutive hciconfig hci0 up/down
executions actually?
> +static int ti_st_send_frame(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct hci_dev *hdev;
> + struct ti_st *hst;
> + long len;
> +
> + if (!skb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Pointless check. The core will not call this function with a NULL
pointer SKB.
> +
> + hdev = (struct hci_dev *)skb->dev;
> + if (!hdev)
> + return -ENODEV;
Even this can't really happen. Have you seen such a case?
> + if (!test_bit(HCI_RUNNING, &hdev->flags))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + hst = hdev->driver_data;
> +
> + /* Prepend skb with frame type */
> + memcpy(skb_push(skb, 1), &bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type, 1);
> +
> + BT_DBG(" %s: type %d len %d", hdev->name, bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type,
> + skb->len);
> +
> + /* Insert skb to shared transport layer's transmit queue.
> + * Freeing skb memory is taken care in shared transport layer,
> + * so don't free skb memory here.
> + */
> + if (!hst->st_write) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + BT_ERR(" Could not write to ST (st_write is NULL)");
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
I don't like these crappy checks on every packet. That is just stupid.
You have checked for st_write when open happens and you set the hdev to
HCI_RUNNING. Are you saying this could change during the lifetime of the
hdev? If so then you have a serious problem here.
> + len = hst->st_write(skb);
> + if (len < 0) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + BT_ERR(" ST write failed (%ld)", len);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> + /* ST accepted our skb. So, Go ahead and do rest */
> + hdev->stat.byte_tx += len;
> + ti_st_tx_complete(hst, bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
What is the reason for this deferred stats update. That code looks
pretty much hackish to me.
> +static void ti_st_destruct(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + if (!hdev)
> + return;
> +
> + BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
> +
> + /* free ti_st memory */
> + kfree(hdev->driver_data);
> +
> + return;
> +}
What are you checking here for? Why do you think that hdev would not be
valid? This is what the btusb and btsdio drivers do:
static void btusb_destruct(struct hci_dev *hdev)
{
struct btusb_data *data = hdev->driver_data;
BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
kfree(data);
}
> +/* Creates new HCI device */
> +static int ti_st_register_dev(struct ti_st *hst)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct hci_dev *hdev;
I prefer if err is last in the variable list.
> +
> + /* Initialize and register HCI device */
> + hdev = hci_alloc_dev();
> + if (!hdev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + BT_DBG("hdev %p", hdev);
> +
> + hst->hdev = hdev;
> + hdev->bus = HCI_UART;
> + hdev->driver_data = hst;
> + hdev->open = ti_st_open;
> + hdev->close = ti_st_close;
> + hdev->flush = NULL;
Please implement a flush callback.
> + hdev->send = ti_st_send_frame;
> + hdev->destruct = ti_st_destruct;
> + hdev->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +
> + if (reset)
> + set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_NO_RESET, &hdev->quirks);
Why do you need this? This should only be crappy devices. Something like
Bluetooth 1.0b old devices.
> + err = hci_register_dev(hdev);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + BT_ERR("Can't register HCI device error %d", err);
> + hci_free_dev(hdev);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + BT_DBG(" HCI device registered (hdev %p)", hdev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
No double empty lines please.
> +static int bt_ti_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int err;
> + static struct ti_st *hst;
See above.
> +
> + BT_DBG(" Bluetooth Driver Version %s", VERSION);
This should be in the module_init function. And should be a BT_INFO and
be precise what driver this actually this.
> +
> + hst = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ti_st), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!hst)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /* Expose "hciX" device to user space */
> + err = ti_st_register_dev(hst);
> + if (err) {
> + kfree(hst);
> + return err;
> + }
Is this ti_st_register device use anywhere else. Then please just
include that code in here to make this clear. All other drivers do all
the work in their probe() callback.
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, hst);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int bt_ti_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct ti_st *hst;
> + struct hci_dev *hdev;
> +
> + hst = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
Here I would prefer this:
struct ti_st *hst = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + if (!hst)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + /* Deallocate local resource's memory */
> + hdev = hst->hdev;
That comment doesn't match what you are doing here.
> +
> + if (!hdev) {
> + BT_ERR("Invalid hdev memory");
> + kfree(hst);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
No need to check for hdev here. If probe fails, then remove should never
be called, right?
And just to be safe you might wanna add this:
dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> +
> + ti_st_close(hdev);
> + hci_unregister_dev(hdev);
> + /* Free HCI device memory */
> + hci_free_dev(hdev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver btwilink_driver = {
> + .probe = bt_ti_probe,
> + .remove = bt_ti_remove,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "btwilink",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +/* ------- Module Init/Exit interfaces ------ */
> +static int __init bt_drv_init(void)
> +{
> + long ret;
> +
> + ret = platform_driver_register(&btwilink_driver);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + BT_ERR("btwilink platform driver registration failed");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
please just do like we do with all other drivers;
BT_INFO(...)
return platform_driver_register(&btwilink_driver);
> +
> +static void __exit bt_drv_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&btwilink_driver);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(bt_drv_init);
> +module_exit(bt_drv_exit);
And this should be btwilink_init and btwilink_exit. Please don't try to
grab some generic namespace.
> +
> +/* ------ Module Info ------ */
> +
> +module_param(reset, bool, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(reset, "Send HCI reset command on initialization");
As mentioned above, that one seems wrong to me. You need to know what
your device supports. And by default it should allow sending HCI_Reset
at init. If not, then just that quirk. No need for module parameter
here.
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Raja Mani <raja_mani@xxxxxx>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Bluetooth Driver for TI Shared Transport" VERSION);
> +MODULE_VERSION(VERSION);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
