Hi,
* Vinicius Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-10-29 09:41:55 -0400]:
> Hi Ville,
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Anderson,
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 01:56:56AM +0200, ext Anderson Briglia wrote:
> >> From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> As L2CAP packets coming over LE don't have any more encapsulation,
> >> other than L2CAP, we are able to process them as soon as they arrive.
> >
> > Why is this change needed? Was something broken without this patch?
> >
>
> This change is needed because without it the receiving side would
> always think that it was receiving continuation frames.
>
> As the flags parameter is zero, it would fall into the "} else {"
> condition, and because no frame was received before, conn->rx_len
> would be zero and the frame would be discarded. Without this patch I
> was seeing those "Unexpected continuation frame ..." messages on the
> receiving side.
>From what I understood the flags are only for ACL connections and LE
links doesn't have fragmentation, right? So we don't need to check flags
here, actually it seems we don't have flags for LE like ACL.
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
ProFUSION embedded systems - http://profusion.mobi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
