> > Shouldn't you instead be using the drivers/bluetooth/hci_{ldisc,h4} code?
>
> We also need the ldisc code to handle events from FM and GPS and since
> that is chip specific we cannot add that to the generic hci_ldisc
> code.
Agreed - it's a different protocol.
> I agree that we might run into problems if two drivers try to register
> the same line discipline. It might then be better to introduce a new
If your ldisc is written properly it shouldn't matter. Each tty has a
private ldisc pointer to keep the per ldisc instance data.
> line discipline then even though that could cause other problems. I do
> not know if it is possible to add a condition in Kconfig otherwise so
> the CG2900 ldisc cannot be active while the "normal" ldisc driver is
> selected.
Not sure I follow the concern here ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
