AVRCP future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi All,

I've been looking into AVRCP a bit lately, since I'm interested in the 'Remote Control 
from Separate Controller' usecase as described in the AVRCP spec, section 2.3.1.1.

However, from the BlueZ source, it seems an AVRCP connection is only set up/allowed when 
there is a AVD sink present, which is in violation of the bluetooth spec, section 2.3.2

Also, the recent progress made by João Paulo Rechi Vita bind the control and audio stream 
closely together (basically disabling the control once audio is not pulseaudio-routed to 
the bluetooth peer).

Now, my questions:

- Is anyone working on AVRCP, besides jprvita?
- Aside from the proposed D-Bus API in doc/control-api.txt, has anyone done some research 
how an AVRCP1.4 interface should look?
- Are there objections to conforming to section 2.3.2, i.e. untying the AVRCP connection 
from the A2DP connection?

I'm willing to put some effort in improving AVRCP, but before I go off blindly coding such 
stuff, please give as much feedback as possible :)

grtz,
Sander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux