2010/7/23 Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Liang Bao <tim.bao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Adapter.RemoveDevice() also removes the pair information according to >> the document doc/adapter-api.txt. However, unplug a virtual cable in >> HID spec doesn't mean unpair. Anyway, let me check the source once >> again. Thanks. > > The question is, why do you want to use virtual cable unplug manually? > There doesn't seems to be any useful use case for that, there is no > "Virtual Cable Plug" either so if we do export virtual cable unplug > feature how we plug it again? Yes, I agree with that virtual plug looks like something hard to understand to an end-user. User will be happy as long as he can connect and disconnect. However, virtual plug is defined by the HID spec as a mandatory requirement for HID host role.By my understanding, this is just to gracefully to remove the 1:1 relationship between the HID device and host. Because unplug doesn't mean unpair, the reconnection procedure still work and then they "plug" again. Maybe we can do a unplug using hidd in command line..? > > -- > Luiz Augusto von Dentz > Computer Engineer > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
