Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In this case the safest approach(in my mind) would be to just > mark the integer __unused. Keep in mind though Im not certain > if this is the right place for this value i.e. will this effect > *instkey or not(please check). This is the wrong approach. Either the variable should be got rid of, or it should be used to replace all the other calls to key_ref_to_ptr() in keyctl_describe_key(). David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html